User generated content- Content created by non-better to do then distribute their work online
Article research
What arguments does wired use to give its opinion on copyright laws?
People break laws every day. Example millions of people jaywalk, Download music, and drive at the speed limit. Some laws are obscure but people find them fun to break. Pepo don't think it's an act of civil has to be idiots; nobody is making a statement makes people don't know the cover songs need this synchronisation license, and even if they did trying to get one is is confusing I am expensive. Unlike the mechanical license with you sorry is a cover song on an album, video sync licenses don't have an affordable flat rate I'm acquire the publishers explicit permission
Do I think UGC artists covering songs should be subjected to copyright law?
I don't think the UGC artists should be subject to copy right law for covering songs because it shows that people across the world are fans of the artists and want to show off their voices to other people within media. I believe if a famous person covers a famous person song without permission that is wrong as they are artists who are listened to worldwide.
Why is the video marker being sued?
As they are using a form of copyright which is illegal
Why do I think the opinions of the artist and the record label differ?
I believe the opinions of the artist and the record label differ because the record label produce the song whereby the artist sings and sometimes creates the lyrics of the song.
Section 6 is looking good - look at my comments for the changes you need to make.
ReplyDeleteWithin this section you are missing one post:
Passive/Active audiences - what does this mean? What examples can you provide?